Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cregane
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Cregane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a house that does not meet the General Notability Guideline. PROD declined by article creator. No appropriate CSD category. Exemplo347 (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. --NoGhost (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Apparently someone's old haunt in college, safe from speedy only because no one thought to make a criteria so mundane. TimothyJosephWood 14:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Total non-notable nonsense. Bordering on WP:PATENT. If a stand-up NN rationale is required, the most obvious is WP:GNG. Guliolopez (talk) 23:33, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.